GelatoSpots

Research edition

Methodology

How we choose

GelatoSpots makes a shortlist, explains why each spot matters, and takes editorial responsibility for the choice. This page describes how that is done, what evidence is used, and what is deliberately not published.

The working model

  1. Discover widely — through ratings, guides, awards, press, local lists and community signals.
  2. Verify useful facts — using official and authoritative sources.
  3. Make an editorial selection — using observable signals and informed judgment.
  4. Add recommendations and deeper validation — where they strengthen context and authority.

Public ratings help surface candidates. They do not determine selection.

What we look at

  • Ingredient provenance
  • Production method and on-site production
  • Seasonality
  • Specialist commitment
  • Longevity and local significance
  • Transparency
  • Distinctive identity

No single signal qualifies a spot. The strength, combination and verifiability of the evidence decide, followed by editorial judgment.

Source authority

Source authority affects research priority and editorial confidence. It does not automatically decide inclusion. Official sources are strongest for factual claims such as ingredients, methods, history, opening status and location, and multiple independent authoritative sources create greater confidence.

StrengthTypical sources
HighSpecialist guides; recognised professionals; named maker recommendations; established editorial sources that directly evaluated the place
SupportingCredible local publications; relevant awards; professional associations; well-sourced features
DiscoveryPublic ratings; social media; generic lists; community discussion

A discovery source is recorded, and is never treated as evidence, because it is not.

We research each city in its own language

An English-language search returns the guide written for visitors. A search in the city’s own language returns the guide written for the people who live there, and those are different lists. The difference between them is most of what this guide is for, so the local-language search is the one that runs first — and it asks for the thing by its own name: sorbetes, nieve de garrafa, bastani, booza, softice, kulfi, granita, not the English translation of any of them.

The publications behind the published records reach 30 countries on their own country-coded domains. That is a rough measure and we would rather publish a rough one than none: it counts where a publication lives rather than what language it prints, so it undercounts the local press that publishes on a .com. It is generated from the records on every build, which means that if this guide ever drifts back to reading the world in English, the number falls and this paragraph stops being able to say it.

We read through translation where we have to. We do not cite a translation: a source is recorded under the title it was published with, and a quotation stays in the language it was given in.

What a published spot must have

  • Correct name and location
  • Current operating status
  • Its primary ice-cream discipline or tradition
  • Several supported factual signals
  • A concise explanation of why it belongs
  • Source references
  • A last-checked date

Unknown fields can remain blank. The minimum cannot. A record below it does not publish, and the build refuses to ship if one slips through.

The Index dimensions

A city’s place in The Gelato Cities Index is decided across six dimensions. Sixty per cent is tied directly to the quality and depth of the current city scene.

  1. 01 Strength of selected spots
  2. 02 Depth and specialist density
  3. 03 Distinctiveness and sense of place
  4. 04 Heritage and ice-cream culture
  5. 05 Innovation and momentum
  6. 06 Professional recognition

Eligibility

  • At least three selected GelatoSpots
  • Sufficient local and official source coverage
  • Evidence across several Index dimensions
  • Research complete enough for fair comparison

Tie-breakers, in order: strength of selected spots, then distinctiveness and sense of place, then depth and specialist density. Promising cities with insufficient evidence are presented as Cities to Watch rather than ranked on thin evidence.

The research universe and the methodology are frozen before any scoring begins.

What we do not publish

  • Per-spot scores or classification symbols
  • Detailed dimension weights and shop-level evaluation notes
  • Research confidence and rejected candidates
  • Private contacts
  • Pre-publication Index calculations

Editorial selection and ranking are independent of any commercial relationship. Commercial records are kept separate from editorial records and joined only after ordering, so a paid relationship cannot influence what is said about a spot or where a city ranks.

Current research state: 50 cities across 33 countries, 224 published spots.